E-Learning and Student’s Achievement: Fulfilling the Needs for Technology Integration

Authors

  • Shynta Amalia UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Muhammad Iqbal Ramdhani Universitas Bina Darma Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30631/ijer.v3i1.55

Keywords:

e-learning, learning level, level of writing, writing achievement

Abstract

The gap between students’ learning level and their level of writing prompted this classroom action research (CAR). E-learning was chosen as a media for students to enhance their understanding in producing a good piece of writing. The results showed that integrating e-learning in writing class contributed to the improvement of students’ writing. E-learning fulfilled the need of extended activities to accelerate students’ comprehension which resulted in their writing achievement. Students who actively participated in e-learning based teaching and learning activities showed a better writing performance in terms of organizing ideas. They also become more active during the classroom discussion due to their awareness of their writing problems.

 

Abstract

The gap between students’ learning level and their level of writing prompted this classroom action research (CAR). E-learning was chosen as a media for students to enhance their understanding in producing a good piece of writing. The results showed that integrating e-learning in writing class contributed to the improvement of students’ writing. E-learning fulfilled the need of extended activities to accelerate students’ comprehension which resulted in their writing achievement. Students who actively participated in e-learning based teaching and learning activities showed a better writing performance in terms of organizing ideas. They also become more active during the classroom discussion due to their awareness of their writing problems.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of second language writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge.
Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21-29.
Gulek, J. C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. The journal of technology, learning and assessment, 3(2).
Jethro, O. O., Grace, A. M., & Thomas, A. K. (2012). E-learning and its effects on teaching and learning in a global age. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 203.
Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1: 1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269-287.
Márkus, B. (2011). E-learning Experiences. Geographia Technica, 14(2).
McMillan, K., & Weyers, J. (2007). How to write essays & assignments. Pearson Education.
Nedeva, V., & Dimova, E. (2010). Some advantages of e-learning in English language training. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8(3), 21-28.
Oshima, A & A. Hogue. (2006). Academic writing (4th ed). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Wu, B., Xu, W., & Ge, J. (2012). Experience Effect in E-Learning Research. Physics Procedia, 24, 2067-2074.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-18

Issue

Section

Articles